Jump to content

Talk:Adobe Flash Builder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

This Wikipedia entry is named "Adobe Flash Builder 4". However, as of July 29, 2009, the IDE is still named Adobe Flex Builder 3 (see http://www.adobe.com). I find confusing to display a name which hasn't still been publicly adopted. An encyclopedia is about the present, not about the future. 194.224.31.97 (talk) 08:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Ignacio Agulló[reply]

Price - FREE - for students and the unemployed

[edit]

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/free/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.99.57 (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Flash Builder 4.6 Standard/FAQ page (http://www.adobe.com/products/flash-builder-standard/faq.html) one can read an answer to the following question "Can education customers including students, faculty, and staff get Flash Builder for free?"
The answer is (I changed a few important words to italics)
"Flash Builder 4.6 Standard Edition is free for all eligible education customers. Students, faculty, and staff can get serial numbers to activate downloadable trial versions by registering on the registration site. During registration, you will be prompted to upload a copy of your student, faculty ID, or employee ID, or you can upload a letter on institutional letterhead proving your current affiliation with an educational institution. Once validated, you will be emailed a free educational serial number for Flash Builder 4.6 Standard. It may take up to two weeks after the request for you to receive the serial numbers."
However during registration on http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/flex/free/index.html, you are not prompted to upload anything (tested on opera and firefox with javascript on and off) and after providing Adobe your name and email address you simply get an "Adobe Flash Builder application denied" email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.123.167.223 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit tag

[edit]

The copy-edit tag seems unnecessary here. Anybody disagree? I will remove it in a few days if not.--Anon423 (talk) 04:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do. The article obviously have cohesion problem: We have isolated paragraph which have tried to mask their isolation by hiding under a heading of their own. I expect this issue cannot be resolved unless the article is expanded. However, I expect expansion alone cannot solve the problem either; the article should be methodically expanded. Nowadays, I try hard to be very economical about the tags I place and I think I have been economical about placing Copy-edit tag. Fleet Command (talk) 10:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Might I suggest the following restructure?
Introduction
Features
History <this would include name change>
See also
References
Bosola (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Flash Builder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Flash Builder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adobe_Flash_Builder&oldid=1204543093"