Talk:Adiabatic MRI Pulses

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 September 2017 by reviewer David.moreno72 (talk · contribs).

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adiabatic MRI pulses

I don't quite agree with the explanatory equations given for the hyperbolic secant pulse (A(t) = Ao*sech(Bt), w1(t) = -µB * tanh(Bt)). Particularly, omega1 (w1 in the previous) should be understood as the precession frequency around the B1 field, not its radial frequency. So shouldn't the second of the two equations use the subscript rf (rotating frame, or radio frequency) instead of '1'? 108.26.204.242 (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the subscript 1 should be dropped in favour of RF as a better label, which should also be applied in the section above which uses an un-subscripted omega = dphi/dt. Maybe the author can weigh in? 128.189.26.0 (talk) 02:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Figure 4

Unless I'm mistaken the figure caption for Figure 4 is incorrect about the left and right cases, wouldn't there be inversion from the right plot but not the left which is so off-resonance that the final B effective is still pointing up along z? 128.189.26.0 (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]