Talk:Adenocarcinoma
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Adenocarcinoma.
|
note
[edit]could someone please expand this article, thank you
I was wondering - how does one change/correct the description for this page's Google listing? It states "... about this rare neoplasm", while adenocarcinoma (in the broadest sense of malignant+gland epithelial) is one of the most common types of human cancer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.74.250 (talk) 18:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Lung Adenocarcinoma Incidence
[edit]Just wondering whether the stats here are accurate - I have a copy of General and Systematic Pathology, 5th ed, 2009 by Underwood and Cross that states 30-40% of incidences of lung cancer as adenocarcinoma. I don't want to change it in case the figures are wrong, but can anyone confirm this?
I believe they are referring to small cell Adenocarcinoma. This is the common form of the cancer. Large cell is the one that is classified as 10% in rarity. I hope this helps.Furballlady (talk) 22:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- According to the 2008 WHO Tumors of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart, adenocarcinomas make up 28% of lung cancers in men and 42% of those in women. There is no such entity as small cell adenocarcinoma of the lung. There is a groups of large cell carcinomas, but these do not show glandular differentiation and, as such are not considered adenocarcinomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.122.66 (talk) 01:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Now sorted (c40% is right). Wiki CRUK John (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
It says insulinoma is a type of VIPoma, yet on each of their respective pages it says insulinoma is a tumor derived from beta cells and VIPoma originated from NON beta islets cells of the pancreas. Can someone clear this up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.123.177.234 (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem to be there now Wiki CRUK John (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
The main article titled "Adenocarcinoma of the lung"[1] also states "Nearly 40% of lung cancers in the US are adenocarcinoma...", therefore contradicting the "80%" stated in this article. Andyjg13 (talk) 20:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Breast Cancer
[edit]I'm looking at a statistical breakdown of breast cancers from 1975 -2009 that shows Adenocarcinoma accounts for 99% of breast cancers, yet there is nothing in this wiki regarding it. I would hope someone can correct this glaring oversight or explain here why it is not a glaring oversight. I'm sure there are people here far more qualified to do it than I am.
Jackhammer111 (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Now sorted Wiki CRUK John (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adenocarcinoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/18/6/1763/T6.expansion.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/18/6/1763/T3.expansion.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090415173047/http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/content/STT_1x_Breast_Cancer_Facts__Figures_2003-2004.asp to http://www.cancer.org/docroot/stt/content/stt_1x_breast_cancer_facts__figures_2003-2004.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)