Talk:Addison, Maine
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Addison, Maine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comment on writing
[edit]Much of this was written by someone who obviously doesn't know the difference between "research article" and "news editorial", but then this is Addison we're talking about so I'm not shocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.255.137 (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Addison, Maine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
==As of September 6, 2008==
Egh. There are no citations at all whatsoever (the one in the Demographics section exempt), and it sounds like a newpaper editorial of some sort. Even check the talk page, others think so. Despite its size, it will have to be a Stub-class article because of all of its problems. This place is relatively small and unknown, so I am giving it a Low-importance rating. --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 01:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 20:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Addison, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)