Talk:Addicted to You (Shakira song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hmlarson (talk · contribs) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I have begun the review and will be posting feedback below. As issues are addressed, please add a note indicating your changes to the relevant item below. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Please modify "and is one of the merengue-influenced songs from the album" to either "is one of (many/several/a few? or actual #)" or "is a merengue-influenced song from the album"
- I took the latter approach. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- "Despite having a title in English, " -> change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
- "Critics praised the video's overall appeal and Shakira's appearance." Consider changing to "Many critics"
Background and composition
[edit]- " Despite having a title in English," change to "Despite having an English title, " or something similar
Music video
[edit]- Change "at Valencia" to "in Valencia"
- Change T-shirt to t-shirt
- Change "sports shoulder length" to "sports shoulder-length"
- "The video was met with positive critical reception" --> consider changing to "Critical reception of the video was generally positive" or something similar
Certifications
[edit]- Consider combining with Charts section per other GA articles about Shakira songs
- I merged it since it's just one certification. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Disamb, References & External links
[edit]- Fix link to Idolator
- Fixed --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Fix Top 50 Canciones Anual 2012 reference (dead link)
- Fixed --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]- Should Pop/Rock be added as genre?
- Actually it's neither just pop/rock. I think we should be specific in this category, hence I listed merengue. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- You can add multiple. I personally would argue that the genre is pop/rock, more specifically Latin pop with merengue and reggaeton influences/styles (similar to what is described in the lead). This is always a subjective decision/classification, IMO. No change is necessary if you do not agree. Hmlarson (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Actually it's neither just pop/rock. I think we should be specific in this category, hence I listed merengue. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Review checklist
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Verified.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I have addressed the comments. Thank you for the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Great job! I've checked the edits - all looks good. Hmlarson (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Great job! I've checked the edits - all looks good. Hmlarson (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have addressed the comments. Thank you for the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.