Talk:Addicted to Noise

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Websites: Computing

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Reference ideas for Addicted to Noise

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1121689/20000630/id_0.jhtml

as noted in http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1121689/20000630/id_0.jhtml, addicted to noise was a pioneering web magazine in its day and an important if small part of early web history. Slamorte (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Goldberg

@Neumu1: Re the discussion on your talk page: I see what you mean, but your recent edits tilt the article's balance too far towards yourself and your own accomplishments, and thus serve as a means of self-promotion. I'm not too comfortable with it, but I could see adding a single sentence along the lines of: "Goldberg went on to a music and culture blog, Days of the Crazy Wild, and publishes a column in the Australian Addicted to Noise, while Jon Luini now does [whatever John Luini does now]". Having John Luini in there balances it out so that the focus isn't solely about a single founder, and instead is simply describing what each of the founders are doing these days (per your argument) in an unbiased way. Would this work for you? Thanks. Brycehughes (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bryce, Yes, that would be great. I'm in total agreement. Do I need to find out what Jon is up to? Neumu1 (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Michael Goldberg[reply]

No need, I googled him. How do you like the addition? Brycehughes (talk) 00:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bryce, Your addition on Oct 18 is great. I'm really pleased. Regarding my addition last night. If you go to this page: http://web.archive.org/web/20000815064446/http://www.addict.com/issues/archive/ and you will see a listing for an article by William Gibson and if you click on 1995 (upper left) and scroll down and link on issue # 1.12 (the Frank Kozik story) and then scroll to the bottom and click on the 3rd icon from the right (contents) you will see articles and columns for that issue. You'll see that there were pieces by Greil Marcus, Dave Marsh, David Was, Billy Altman, Roy Trakin, R. Meltzer and other name critics. Then if you click on 44.1 (it's in the contents) you will get a page of album review links with reviews by Deborah Frost, Chris Morris and others. If you go to issue 1.09 and get to the table of contenst and click on staff you'll see Lenny Kaye and some of the other writers. If you go to issue 2.09 and click on the table of congtenst link on the bottom of one of the articles and then in the hype section click on staff you will see Joey Ramone listed as a contributor. I hope that provides what you need. Thanks, Neumu1 (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC) Michael[reply]

The link is currently down, but I'll take your word for it. You're welcome to re-add the information of course – just make sure you cite your sources. If you're using the "edit source" button to edit, you can use "ref" tags like this: <ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20000815064446/http://www.addict.com/issues/archive/</ref>. (That's the manual way, anyway – there's other ways to do them but I'm unfamiliar with them.) Here's a beginning how-to guide: Help:Referencing for beginners; and a more advanced one: Wikipedia:Citing sources. Let me know if you need help. Brycehughes (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is Addicted To Noise Still alive?

Is Addicted To Noise Still alive? The beginning of the article reads as if it is not. Presumably it is in Australia?

There is a website, but the story of how it survived or was reborn is not in the Wikipedia article? Its current status would be worth setting out in the article.

http://addictedtonoise.com.au/dreaming-bob-dylans-basement-tapes/

Australian exile? 131.111.184.102 (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Addicted to Noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.addict.com/issues/archive/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Addicted to Noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019071148/http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/tag/jon-luini/ to http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/tag/jon-luini/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.addict.com/ATN/issues/back/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]