Jump to content

Talk:Adaptive resonance theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I have adapted the recent (first major) contribution to this page from a research paper I wrote on neural networks, the entirety of which is available at http://www.angelfire.com/il/jandar7/ConceptLearningPaper.html. I have little Wikipedia page creation experience and have only just created a user account, (unfortunately after having already made my first save to this page) so I am sure that this could use a good deal of formatting work. I'll be checking up on it and (hopefully) working on it further. -JandarShadowstar

A colleague and I are currently doing the same. If possible, we'll beef the entry up a bit. --seto 08:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, guys... a page on ART with no reference to Grossberg's instar and outstar models? Yes, some more work is indicated. -- Wesley R. Elsberry 14:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Am I the only one who noticed that Fuzzy ART has the unlucky acronym FART?

Re: Wesley R. Elsberry: How are Grossberg's instar and outstar models related to ART? I think your comment would apply better to the Stephen Grossberg page. --JandarShadowstar 23:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As noted at 'Scholarpedia':
"In ART models, Grossberg (1976b) used instars to define the learning in bottom-up adaptive filters, and outstars to define the learning in top-down expectations." [1]
This is not arcane knowledge. Anyone who has actually implemented an ART model (raises hand) has to know this. ART 1 in particular is historically interesting because it is an early artificial neural network model built substantially in a modular fashion leveraging the operational behavior of multiple different previously existing models. Wesley R. Elsberry (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adaptive resonance theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colored text

[edit]

Why is there colored text in this article? This is the first time I've seen such text in a Wikipedia article. Is it even in line with formatting guidelines? I personally would vote for removing it and making all text black.--Zamomin (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]