Talk:Adamstown Rosebud FC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adamstown Rosebud FC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Soccer Low‑importance

	Australia portal Adamstown Rosebud FC is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Notability

In response to "Non-notable football team. Plays at an essentially social level of the game." I can only disagree, the team are semi-professionals and play in a semi-professionals competition. Not too mention the huge historical significance of the club in Newcastles football history. The club 120 years old in 2009 formerly played in the National Soccer League.

I disagree that the the second division of the Newcastle competition is a notable level of football (I have my doubts about the first division, only the existence of Northern New South Wales Football as an independent body gets that over the line). But, if they played in the NSL, they are indeed notable. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 05:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they did play for one year in a former national football competition, after the bankruptcy of another Newcastle team.--Grahame (talk) 05:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Players

Section requires cleanup. Most of these players are not notable at all according to Wikipedia's notability requirements.

Suggest remove all players barring those with Wikipedia profiles. If there are players that merit Wikipedia profiles but do not have them (e.g. went on to have a professional career, represented Australia internationally) they should be created. 203.33.163.234 (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adamstown Rosebud FC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006161659/http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSLchamps.html to http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSLchamps.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]