Talk:Adam Newman/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 02:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Looks fine; all of the sources are reliable and verifiable; good job.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Fairly well covered as far as focus.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, the article is actually in good article condition. There are still areas of improvement, however, all articles should always have room for improvement, regardless of their status. Copyediting doesn't necessarily have to be done by the Guild, but as long as a request is there, it should get done soon or later. Pass. --Brick House 337 14:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: