Jump to content

Talk:Adam Jury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion

[edit]

it seems somewhat inconsistent to tag this article for deletion when others with less information remain -- the page's subject has produced a number of award-winning works; doesn't that count as relevant?

I'll remove the unverifiable bit until I can find a citation, although I feel given the state of wikipedia pages on the subject's peers, this entry warrants preservation. Elliebear 08:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please note that sometimes articles which do not meet the notability criteria do stay longer than they should, but that is not considered a reason to let any other remain. What would be necessary is for reliable and secondary sources to be cited with non-trivial information about the subject. Primary sources, such as web pages created by an article's subject or someone affiliated with it, can be used to supplement an article, but not as the sole sources-secondary sourcing is required. Seraphimblade 08:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a vanity page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:527F:8EE0:74CA:FE23:79C5:A67E (talk) 02:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Userfying

[edit]

I have a good source for Adam Jury. The article was deleted after AFD by Quarl, who appears to be no longer active. I will be able to add some sourced content to this article in a few days. BOZ (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedurally closed. Try WP:AFC or WP:DRV. Jenks24 (talk) 08:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Draft:Adam JuryAdam Jury – The article was sent to AFD in 2007 and had no sources at the time, and was deleted after only one concurring delete response. I restored the article to my user space last year and added a good reliable source and moved to the new Draft space. I am not certain if it is ready to go back into article space, but I feel it is worth discussing. If any other users can find additional sources to add, that would help with any outstanding notability issues. BOZ (talk) 21:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adam Jury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]