Talk:Adam Bede

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

19th Century Novels

The introductory paragraph states that 'the novel is used in studies of the Nineteenth Century novel' or something similar. Isn't this observation empty, a bit like noting that the plays of Shakespeare are used in studies of Shakespeare? Should it be removed? Can the references it makes to other studies be retained? Indy4ever (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Character articles

I have tidied up the character list a little by arranging a few of them into families. What do people think of certain characters having their own articles? --MacRusgail 20:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, if we were to have them they should be clearly only the lead or main character that had this treatment. They need to satisfy the normal notability criteria for articles. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 10:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have created articles for Adam Bede (character), Dinah Morris and Hetty Sorrel. I will also create one for Captain Arthur Donnithorne, and that shall be it. These are the four main characters and are more worthy of articles IMHO than the various Pokemon characters kicking about wikipedia. --MacRusgail 19:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that seperate character articles are entirely necessary, and the character list seems 'boringly' long. Let's just keep it to the main protagonists and most important minor characters. Also, the reference to Nature in the novel is completely mundane - this seems to bear no significance in the story and don't really see its relevance here.Ivankinsman 20:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant

This part of the introduction seems irrelevant to me:

"...and is used in university studies of 19th century English literature."

It's not used exclusively at universities, as this implies. Agree, disagree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.65.182.34 (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

genre painting

Though I have no problem with the fact the book may have influenced art in the day there is a quote "Houssaye speaks (p, 179) of Terborch's "gout tout hollandais, empreint de poesie realiste", and argues that "l'oeuvre de Gerard de Terburg est le roman intime de la Hollande, comme l'oeuvre de Gerard Dow en est le roman familiere." " is it possible to have a translation of this in English, I would but unfortunately I would need to use Google translate and it sounds clunky Amanda138a (talk) 11:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adam Bede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Bede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060910151731/http://www.oberlin.edu/english/syllabi/fall06/234igf06.pdf to http://www.oberlin.edu/english/syllabi/fall06/234igf06.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]