Talk:Adán Medrano Rodríguez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 01:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I'll review this one, too. Comments should be added soon. Kingsif (talk) 01:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Style - Pass well written, structure, and connected throughout
Coverage - Pass appears to hit all the info available, gives good context without being excessive
Illustration - Pass one image of subject at top, might do with another image but not necessary
Neutrality - Hold generally good, one note in "Arrest and reaction" Pass
Stability - Pass months since an edit not for ref cleanup
Verifiability - Pass good range of RS and everything cited inline
Copyright - Pass Check clear

Well written and clear
Comprehensive
Perhaps the very start is not the best place for the FBI profile, however, it does work nicely within the section and would not be suitable in the other sections, which don't seem to deal with the FBI. This is to say, it works well where it is, and only if the article were to be restructured (which it does not need) would it suit going anyway else.
Good use of wikilinks
Good use of note to include extensive list of codenames
@MX: Could rephrase the start of the last paragraph to be more focused on Medrano than García Mena.

@MX: "16:00 hours" in Standard American English would be rendered as 4 pm
@MX: Perhaps a better term than "rescue" could be used - it sounds vaguely heroic when it would be a prison-break of a dangerous criminal
Otherwise, written very well with good structure throughout
Good use of wikilinks and inline explanations where relevant
Extensive coverage

@MX: "military installation" reads a bit odd, perhaps 'facility' is a more common term
@MX: I'm pretty sure "evidence" is a collective noun, i.e. not pluralized
Possible concern over OR re. the Quintero Payáns, but well explained and sourced in note, so doesn't breach policy
Still well written
Suitable coverage

Good explanation of what a minimum wage sentence is.
@MX: Any reason given why González Sánchez wasn't happy (I can guess, but if there are sources available, it could be included)
Good coverage otherwise.

on hold Looks good, anything that needs attention has been pinged to MX. Kingsif (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: I believe I've addressed all your points. Thank you for the thorough review! MX (✉ • ✎) 18:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]