Talk:Acute medicine

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion

ISBN 9781860163210 (ISBN-10 1860163211) is a 2007 report by the Royal College of Physicians of London that outlines the field of acute medicine and its services. Seems the principle was introduced in 2004. JFW | T@lk 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No: 2000 - Federation of Medical Royal Colleges. Acute medicine: the physician’s role – proposals for the future. Report of a working party. London: Federation of Medical Royal Colleges, 2000. JFW | T@lk 22:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some stuff that will need to be cited

doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp045 is a systematic review on the effectiveness of AMUs.

PMID 19634381 - study that shows acute physicians are effective in many ways - widely cited as part of the evidence base for AM. JFW | T@lk 21:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

doi:10.12968/hmed.2008.69.Sup7.30432 - older source on the design of AMUs. JFW | T@lk 13:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120107044609/http://www.acutemedicine.org.uk:80/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1&Itemid=3. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]