Talk:ActoBiotics

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect to Lactococcus lactis.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about ActoBiotics.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Leenrosseel (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (due to promotional content and WP:SPA)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I have deleted some paragraphs that might be promotion. --Leenrosseel (talk) 09:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the article has credible references. The statements that are made in the article come from scientific and/or credible references, such as the Journal of Clinical Investigation and the University of Leuven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leenrosseel (talk • contribs) 10:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About the Duplicator Detector I wanted to notice that this Wikipedia-page cites from references, e.g. a press release from the University of Leuven. The other website, http://www.aescap.com/index.php?p=news&id=130, cites from the same press release. Hence the duplicating of some phrases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leenrosseel (talk • contribs) 09:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not good enough. A press release is subject to copyright. If you copy from it, you need to put the quoted material in quotes, and ensure that the length of the quotes is not excessive.

As an important aside, please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks which eschews the use of the trademark symbol.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 17:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]