Talk:Active fault

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Active fault is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article renaming (historical)

This article was moved/renamed from "Active faults" to "Active fault". The vote on it lasted only for 2 hours 16 minutes. Then an administrator moved the page, probably because the vote result would have been self-evident. If you have something against the new title, you can propose moving the page again in Wikipedia:Requested moves. But you must have really good reasons because Wikipedia article names are usually in singular form. Below is the original vote:

Prefer singular nouns. I propose the move on the ground of this Wikipedia naming convention. -Hapsiainen 19:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support, certainly. -Hapsiainen 19:36, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Surely we can simply move this information on the definition of what is an active geologic fault to the article which discusses what a geologic fault is? Or do we also need an article on wikipedia which is inactive fault?Rolinator 09:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Active fault → Geologic fault — As said on the talk, the info on this page is merely a little addendum to that found on Geologic fault and the existence of Actie fault would be redundant if the page was moved/merged there. Rolinator 09:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Oppose. This is really a merge request that the requestor can do on their own. Just move any data that is not in the target article and replace Active fault with a redirect. Or am I missing something? Vegaswikian 07:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

No consensus to move. —Mets501 (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Active fault. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525104129/http://maps.gns.cri.nz/website/af/ to http://maps.gns.cri.nz/website/af/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Active fault. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]