Jump to content

Talk:Actionable information logistics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The word, "actionable" is used incorrectly throughout this article. This looks like an attempt to fabricate a term, "actionable information logistics". It is not clear why this is being done.

66.93.100.110 04:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I agree - this does not make sense in English. It needs to be parsed as "(Actionable Information) Logistics" rather than the expected "Actionable (Information Logistics)" - in English this can best be indicated by saying "Logistics for Actionable Information". Thus we get closer to the apparent intent.

But the term does exist, see [1] where a paper with this title was offered. So it's an attempt to document the term which seems legitimate, though on notability I think it might fail.

Meanwhile the references given are very notable, yet appear nowhere else in Wikipedia. I believe we need an entry for Action Workflow, so as to legitimately capture the references. In contrast "Actionable Information Logistics" is a very specific workflow example, with a fairly misleading (English) name. If it really does relate to Action Workflow it could be given as an example.

I consider myself competent to evaluate this further if anyone can find an on-line copy of the cited paper which I have been unable to do. In German would be OK. I'm watching this page.

Shannock9 (talk) 19:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]