Talk:Action of 9 September 1796/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 11:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Decent work there like normal, but I have a few comments.
- Thanks for this review. I have some questions. Also, has this passed? The last line seems to suggest you passed it.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- Fix dashes using the script
- What script?--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- CharInsert. It is on by default. You can turn it on in your preferences
- It is unecessary to cites like this The M4 Sherman served in WWII.[1] It later served in the Korean War.[1]
- I think I've only done this when there is only one ref in the paragraph, in which case I've spaced them out to make it clear the whole paragraph is sourced.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
*Space between the "p" and number in the cites- Is this really necessary? I thought it was up to editor preference?--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- DAB link to broadside — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk • contribs) 11:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- You only need one kind of identifier for the references, not two.
- I don't know what this means.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- It means that you don't need both oclcs and isbns for your refs.
- Please and oclcs or isbns for two of the sources
- I don't know what an OCLC is or where to find it. The two references without ISBNS were published before ISBNS were invented.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- OCLC numbers are found on www.worldcat.org. There are used for identifing refs that were mad before isbns were invented.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Passing, well done (I have finished two issues on my own).--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)