Talk:Action This Day (memo)

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To Add

I will add the references. Also eventually as an appendix the text of the memo. Hugo999 (talk) 22:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC) NB: For full text see external link. Hugo999 (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harvie-Walker was a red herring

Our article followed Smith in Station X by having Milner-Barry give the letter to one Brigadier Harvie-Walker, Churchill's principal private secretary. Unfortunately, there does not seem ever to have been a Brigadier Harvie-Walker, nor did Churchill have a principal private secretary of that name regardless of rank. Churchill did, however, have a principal parliamentary secretary George Harvie-Watt, who was a Brigadier, and is the person Milner-Barry says he handed the letter to at Number 10. I have corrected the article accordingly, using the chapter from Copeland's The Essential Turing as reference. I was put on to the right man by IP 142.112.221.64 at the Humanities RefDesk, to whom we owe our thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 10:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]