Talk:Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2024.

Timeline

See Abolition of slavery timeline. This shows that many non-British attempts were made to abolish slavery much earlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.109.117 (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the issue is not the abolition of slavery but the abolition of the international slave TRADE, & Britain was the leader there. Rjensen (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100311084236/http://amistad.mysticseaport.org/timeline/atlantic.slave.trade.html to http://amistad.mysticseaport.org/timeline/atlantic.slave.trade.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Gordon date wrong

This article says

"Nathaniel Gordon, who was hanged in 1808, was the only person to be executed for slave-trading in the United States.[14]"

Not only does this article say that slave trading was only made a capital crime in 1820 but the article on Gordon says he was hanged in 1862. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear sentence

The article says in the second paragraph:

"This legislation was promoted by President Thomas Jefferson, who called for its enactment in his 1806 State of the Union Address. He had promoted the idea since the 1770s. It reflected the force of the general trend toward abolishing the international slave trade, which Virginia followed by all the other states had prohibited or restricted since then."

The third sentence here is formulated in an unclear manner -- "...which Virginia followed by...". Perhaps it is just lacking commas (which I have inserted in brackets):

"This legislation was promoted by President Thomas Jefferson, who called for its enactment in his 1806 State of the Union Address. He had promoted the idea since the 1770s. It reflected the force of the general trend toward abolishing the international slave trade, which Virginia[,] followed by all the other states[,] had prohibited or restricted since then."

Deardavid7 (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC) deardavid7[reply]

Not an amendment

I eliminated a reference to an "amendment" passing in 1807. I looked through a lot of the House journal for that session, and what I saw was just the act itself - in 1807 a constitutional amendment would not have been necessary, since the Constitution's prohibition on banning the importation of slaves was about to expire on January 1, 1808. And, for what it's worth, the Senate appears to have passed the bill first and sent it down to the House (although Varnum may have had his part in pushing the Senate into action). The House then amended it, and the Senate re-approved it on March 2, at the end of the session.Brianyoumans (talk) 02:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]