Talk:Acrydite
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Chemical structure
[edit]I have removed the {{chembox}} and "chemical structure" section. The data in the infobox does not match the Chemical Abstracts description of acrydite. Also, the literature references for the structure that was shown in the infobox do not seem to relate directly to what is described in the article. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- If it is a phosphoramidite what is its structure? Is there any reference that it is indeed a phosphoramidite? --kupirijo (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
With Google I found one result giving the IUPAC name as 6-methacrylamidohexyl phosphate, from this and the formula C10H20NO5P (multiple sources) I conclude that the image shows the binding oxygen atom of the phosphate group as a carbon atom. Correct me if I'm wrong. Simon de Danser (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Acrydite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017212344/http://www.flagshipventures.com/news/12132002p.html to http://www.flagshipventures.com/news/12132002p.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)