Talk:Across the Way/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 09:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Going to take a look at another lost film article. The review should be up soon. good888 (talk) 09:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Lead section

• "produced by the Thanhouser Company under the Princess brand." Link Princess.
• "The trick involves the friend's love interest being attacked by an assailant and works" I have changed and to which.
• "took a personal interest in the productions at the New Rochelle studio." Link New Rochelle if possible.

Plot

• Can I ask, what's with the :710s?

Cast

• Likewise for here?

Release and Reception

• And here as well?
• I have changed the sentence about it being released in The United Kingdom.
• "However, the quality of the Princess films towards the end of its productions were not pleasing the audiences." Source please.

References

• Link the publishers of these sources.

Going to place on hold for now. I will promote once the issues are addressed. good888 (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Good888: Those were page citations, but were useless here. Fixed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

@ChrisGualtieri: You still need to add a source as to why the quality of the Princess films were not pleasing the audiences. For now, I have added source three at the end of this sentence. With that, I am promoting to GA class. good888 (talk) 09:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

@Good888: - Sorry, the source at the end after the Just Kids release contained the information that the works were not performing well with audiences. It was the reason why it was replaced and rebranded - despite keeping the same casts! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)