Jump to content

Talk:Acquis communautaire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

English pronunciation

[edit]

The "English pronunciation" given for this term - is this genuine? Sourced?? Surely most English people would (attempt to) pronounce it the French way? --Kotniski (talk) 06:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They probably do, just badly. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 12:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the source. (I still don't believe it, though.)--Kotniski (talk) 12:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The acquis

[edit]

Of course we refer to the acquis in the article without constantly invoking the EU or communautaire adjective, but this is just a perfectly normally element of English. In the same way, having established that the organisation is called the European Union in a relevant article, we may proceed to refer to it as the Union without the European qualifier. But we don't begin the lead of the European Union article by giving Union as an alternative name for the EU.

I think you're highly unlikely to find a reliable secondary source that calls the body of EU law, "the acquis", without first referring to it as either the acquis communautaire or the EU acquis. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 12:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in EU documents, where people know that the context is the EU (like this one), I think "the acquis" is quite normal.--Kotniski (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And indeed the dictionary entry given as a source for the pronunciation also mentions that it's often shortened to acquis.--Kotniski (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's not such a good source after all -:) But just in an encyclopedic context how can be say that acquis communautaire can be shortened to acquis, and then go on in the same article to describe how the term acquis has been applied to and used by other bodies like the Council of Europe, the WTO, the OSCE, and the OECD? — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 13:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just because EU acquis can be shortened to acquis, doesn't mean that acquis has exclusively that meaning.--Kotniski (talk) 16:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New name

[edit]

This article should be moved to Union acquis since this name is used after the Lisbon Treaty entered into force. --Glentamara (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acquis communautaire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acquis and Brexit

[edit]

I'd think that this article should discuss (or at least mention) the issues surrounding the acquis in the context of Brexit, in particular what the proposed "Great Repeal Bill" aims to do with the acquis and the technical and political challenges this project / approach faces. Unfortunately I can't do it, as it requires UK law expertise and familiarity with the UK internal discussions.Chilrreh (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Acquis communautaire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added an additional reference on the OECD Acquis. Sorbiodunensis (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Acquis_communautaire&oldid=1197930799"