Talk:Acoustica: Alarm Will Sound Performs Aphex Twin

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

OGG?

Perhaps a .ogg is in store to demonstrate the difference between James' original piece and the interpretation.

The only problem might lie in choosing which song, as he has had a varying career. Good luck, fellow Aphex Twin fan Wiki-users, I know we'll find one in time. --MobiusStriptease 17:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of the arrangements are really interesting. Def. a short selection of both of them would be really interesting to compare, I'll see what I can do later. Perhaps "Cock" would be an appropriate choice, as AWS uses that piece as a signature piece frequently, plus it's one that I think actually improves on James' work. 38.149.19.19 19:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What About "Mt. Saint Michal + Saint Micheals mount"? I think that is a great example of the diffrences between the origanal and the recreation.

Conkern65 (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alarmwillsound.jpg

Image:Alarmwillsound.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]