Talk:Acidithrix ferrooxidans
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Acidithrix ferrooxidans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zstevenson9. Peer reviewers: Vide351, YxMUfe.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]Several sentences in here are fragments or don't make sense. Read again carefully for comprehension. "Mine water impacted environments could use A. ferrooxidans for clean-up capabilities.[8]" - it is not clear from this sentence how it could be used or what it would clean up. Eswanner (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- This line does not make sense: "For pH homeostasis the urease genes could aid survival due to encoded the proton pumping activity.[4][7] Uptake of urea is documented in Py-F3 and allows for the intracellular production of urea, rather than taking it in to the cell.[4]"Eswanner (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- It is not clear what the implication of this line is: "Compared to Py-F3, C25 did not encode for the ribulose, but future studies will need to be done for a definitive answer." Do you mean RubisCO and carbon fixation?Eswanner (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)