Talk:Achatina achatina

Gastropods High‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

References

Possibly describes this snail being introduced into North America: http://www.petmedsonline.org/killer-bees-and-other-mistakes.html 216.75.170.81 19:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natural enemies.

Regarding this edit by Androstachys, the source says: "Since there are often no natural enemies...". It does not say: "... often with Man as the only natural enemy". Man is not mentioned. I have reverted per WP:SYNTH. DVdm (talk) 10:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Androstachys reverted again with a message on my talk page. I have pointed to this section on the article's talk page, and reverted again, pending consensus. Other opinions about this? - DVdm (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gee - could you be cherry picking from the source? A search of the same source using the phrase 'Achatina achatina' rather than your more limiting phrase 'Achatina achatina natural enemies', turns up "the most popular genus utilised for human nutrition is the Achatina with Achatina achatina......". Did I somehow misinterpret what this means? Androstachys (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One must always be careful with interpretations not to go into WP:SYNTH. Besides, i.m.o. the phrase "natural enemies" usually excludes us, humans, aka "Man" anyway. Let's see what other contributors think. DVdm (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't put 3RR warnings on my talk page. DVdm (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you suggest I put them? Androstachys (talk) 08:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have put that request about 3RR on your user talk page. It does not belong on article talk space. My apologies. DVdm (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Androstachys, I notice that again (if I counted correctly, for the 4th time now) you removed the carefully referenced phrase "often with no natural enemies". You now replaced it with predation by disease and by Man. I.m.o. neither really count as what is generally understood by "natural enemies", but let's not start a discussion about that - I see what you mean and I have no problem with keeping that. I think that we need to say something about this as an introduction to the remark about the population problem in the next sentence. So I have added the original phrase:

The species is subject to predation by disease and as a food item by African tribes, and often it has no other natural enemies.

If you like, we can replace "and often" with "but often", but surely we can both live with this, right? DVdm (talk) 10:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have cast the long url reference into a properly templated journal citation. DVdm (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Achatina achatina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100708224422/http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/gas/downloads/achatinaachatina.pdf to http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/gas/downloads/achatinaachatina.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Achatina achatina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160616175729/http://dillonr.people.cofc.edu/Cowie-et-al-2009.pdf to http://dillonr.people.cofc.edu/Cowie-et-al-2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"gigantocochlea"

I question the name "gigantocochlea". I could find no references on the web that didn't seem to have been copied from Wikipedia, other than the genus name of the house-sized fictional giant pink snail from Dr. Doolittle. (https://fiction-taxonomy.fandom.com/wiki/Great_glass_sea_snail) Obsolete but legitimate genus and species names usually leave some traces in the scientific literature.

I marked it with a "citation needed" tag rather than outright deleting it. Aliza250 (talk) 16:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]