Talk:Aces & Eights: Shattered Frontier

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternate History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History articles

Notability

I'm not convinced that the award is sufficiently notable in istself to confer notability Mayalld (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If not, we should delete almost all articles about role-playing games. Check the category Role-playing games, probably no article there should be allowed to exist on Wikipedia if this article is not notable. --claes (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Origins Awards are notable enough to have an entry in Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Notability (toys and games)#Criteria #2 states, "The toy or game has won a notable award or a commendation from a recognized national or international educators, parents, medical, or consumers group or some other similar body." If the Origins Awards are a "Notable" Award by virtue of having an entry in Wikipedia then surely an Origins Award Winner falls under that Criteria. --User:Greylond

That should do. Can we agree that Aces & Eight is notable to have an article on Wikipedia? --claes (talk) 07:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Work in progress

Beginning an expansion of this article, starting with the setting summary. More to come later. --User:Greylond —Preceding comment was added at 00:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Keep up the good work. --claes (talk) 07:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed deletion

This article is notable according to the Wikipedia notability standards. The book has won an Origins Award and is also nominated for an ENnie Award. So this article should stay. If not, almost all articles about books and role-playing games on Wikipedia should be deleted. --claes (talk) 09:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, the game has been nominated for Four Ennie Awards. Please respond to my comments above about the Wiki Definition of Notable. RE: Wikipedia:Notability (toys and games)#Criteria #2. I am removing the Notability and deletion warning until someone can dispute that it is NOT Notable since as far as I can tell it is Notable according to the criteria. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greylond (talk • contribs) 11:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aces & Eights: Shattered Frontier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081115185651/http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=25544 to http://www.gamingreport.com/article.php?sid=25544

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]