Jump to content

Talk:Accrington Academy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alumnus in Latin means a pupil or foster-child. There will be several thousands of ex-pupils of Accrington High School for Girls and Moorhead Sports College. Should an author declare a motive when listing only five alumni? Should permission be sought from alumni before their names are listed? Try, perhaps Notable Alumni, Prominent Alumni, Distinguished Alumni...

81.102.176.106 (talk) 23:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, guidelines for this are conveniently available at WP:WPSCH/AG, which is worth looking at before you rush into print. Second, the list of alumni is already headed 'Notable Alumni'. And third, as for writing to each alumnus/a before writing about them in an encyclopedia entry... words fail me. If we are interested in etymology, by the by, the word 'silly' is derived from the ME 'sely', meaning 'innocent' (the sense in which Chaucer, for instance, used it). But I do not think you are being innocent in your contributions, Mr Hartley, merely silly. Crac4543 (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt response. I had no evidence of your thought until you wrote about it here.

81.102.176.106 (talk) 12:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia carries a category link to Mathematics and Computing Colleges in England, and Accrington Academy is listed there. The Accrington Academy article says that the academy has designated specialisms in Sports and Mathematics but does not claim special status in Mathematics and Computing. A link at DCSF took me to a list of specialist schools dated 2006. I wonder whether or not the academy is a Mathematics and Computing College, and if the difference is important enough to be worth resolving.

81.102.176.106 (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although the alumni section is indeed headed Notable Alumni I remain in favour of including Notable or some alternative to begin the body text because I fear that Wikipedia articles suffer from selective quotation.

If words fail us when discussing elementary courtesy then the failure is more than one of words. I regret that I have found no time to read the advertised guidelines - and I understand that this may by itself condemn me as silly - but I would expect that standard practice would include advance notification of personal details appearing in a world-spanning medium, even though previous agreement exists. Is the agreement contemplation-stable? An alumnus who agreed to publication may later reconsider and change hir [his/her] view.

81.102.176.106 (talk) 18:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accrington Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]