Talk:Accord on Afrikaner self-determination

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Second referendum

This article claims that "a second referendum would be called to test the results of the negotiations among white voters." This is not correct. As we say on the article 1992 South African apartheid referendum:

De Klerk told the press that he would interpret a majority "Yes" vote as a mandate to enter into binding agreements with the ANC and other black leaders, without further approval from white voters. He stated that a second referendum to approve the terms of the constitutional settlement would not be necessary unless they differed "substantially" from the government's promises.^[1]^[2]

The statement should be removed. Also the claim that the NP swore they would never accept a proportional electoral system needs a citation. - htonl (talk) 10:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the sentence.I90Christian (talk) 14:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Kraft, Scott (25 February 1992). "De Klerk's Question for Whites: 'Do You Support Reform?'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 July 2012.
^ Wren, Christopher S. (19 March 1992). "South African Whites Ratify De Klerk's Move to Negotiate with Blacks on a New Order". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 July 2012.

[latimes-1] Kraft, Scott (25 February 1992). "De Klerk's Question for Whites: 'Do You Support Reform?'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 July 2012.

[nytimes-2] Wren, Christopher S. (19 March 1992). "South African Whites Ratify De Klerk's Move to Negotiate with Blacks on a New Order". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 July 2012.

[1]

[2]