Talk:Accident (2009 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,045)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,464) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,343)

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.

(Possible) Copyright infringement

The entire plot summary was copy&pasted from [1]. Despite correctly citing the website as the source, copying a section like this from a commercial and copyrighted website (even though it is the distributor of the movie and likely wouldn't mind) is surely a copyright infringement? (Sidenote: Plot summary on IMDB seems to be exactly the same.) If I am mistaken, and this is for some reason okay, I'm sincerely sorry for my mistake. But that website clearly says "Copyright Asia Media Group", and copying the entire synopsis is not exactly a short quote. 87.78.3.205 (talk) 01:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot mangled?

The opening scene is actually a woman dying in an auto accident, who subsequently turns out to be the Brain's wife. After the son who contracted his father's death falls to his death, the Brain tails the insurance agent and finds that he is familiar then intimate with a woman who I think is the Brain's supposedly dead wife. The scene before the Brain's death is a revenge killing he tries to stop. Even if Uncle somehow caused Fatty's death, the Brain would still want revenge on his wife for staging her death and betraying him. Even if I'm wrong about the actress being the same, that's what the Brain thinks and why it's so painful for him to listen to them making love. Can someone explain this?GregoryBowerman (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accident (2009 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]