Talk:Acanthodactylus erythrurus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Question about images and conservation section
[edit]Hi! I would love to see a few more images (one or two at most) of the patterning differences of the spots on these lizards back. I also would love a few more details on the importance of their feet and what role this plays in their speed and agility. Overall great page though- I really appreciated the geographic range vs habitat distinction.
== images reproduction request for the Wikipedia free encyclopedia
Here some addresses follow to pages that contain images that might be worth asking permission for:
http://www.ittiofauna.org/webmuseum/rettili/acantodactylus_erythrurus01.htm
http://pdubois.free.fr/espece.php?MyEspece=ACAERY
http://www.mediterranea.org/cae/divulgac/reptiles/lagcolir.htm
Ncrfgs 01:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
The content of this article may be more appropiated for Acanthodactylus.
Ncrfgs 00:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Incredible deja vue!
[edit]When we were young, and sometimes a little too wild in our father's opinion, he sometimes quoted some 19'th century German naturalist, who was infamous for ascribing various misplaced characters to animals; if I got this right. (If I've heard his name, I've forgotten it.) The quotation was, roughly:
- This animal is very evil; it defends itself, when you attack it.
Now, in this wp article, I just found a rather similar characterisation:
- The spiny-footed lizard does not have a particularly pleasant nature. Like every member of this genus, it is very aggressive and bites tenaciously if one tries to catch it.
Isn't this a grossly outdated attitude - in the 21'st century, if not in the 19'th? JoergenB (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
10/21 Edits
[edit]Hello! I edited this article, mainly by fixing the citations. The article was mostly uncited, so I had to add in citations for every new fact. In addition, there were many repeat citations that needed to be fixed that I was able to delete. Furthermore, some information might have been unreliable so I removed them for now until further references can be provided.Nikhil.sekar (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)