Talk:Academia Sinica

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why are there so many links to external Web sites? I will need to read the Manual of Style more carefully, but I do not believe this is standard for Wikipedia. Homunculus (duihua) 15:14, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Works published by academia sinica

Phonological Profile of Zhongu: A New Tibetan Dialect of Northern Sichuan* Jackson T.-S. Sun Academia Sinica

http://www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/files/publication/j2003_4_05_9138.pdf

Rajmaan (talk) 06:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academia Sinica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100710151647/http://tigp.sinica.edu.tw:80/portal_programs.html to http://tigp.sinica.edu.tw/portal_programs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

China vs. the People's Republic of China

It does not make sense to say that 'China' was established at any time. China is a geographical location. This would be true of any other country. We do not say 'England was established', or 'France was established' or 'India was established.' Please stop edit warring over such a pointless topic and devote your time to more useful edits. Rgr09 (talk) 21:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

China is "a unitary one-party sovereign state in East Asia." Lysimachi (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stalking of my edits aside, a charge which Lysimachi denies, despite evidence to the contrary (but for my edits, would the user have edited?), the terms Lysimachi uses are unnecessarily confusing. E.g. the founded parameter, as they would have it reads as this "1928 (Republic of China)" "1949 (Taiwan)", this despite it referring to the same state, yes post-1949 on the ROC's relocation to Taiwan, instead of the simpler "founded 1928 in Nanjing" and "1949 in Taipei". "Founded by the Republic of China" then "Founded by Taiwan." These are the sort of terms which provide unnecessary confusion and complexity.--Tærkast (Discuss) 18:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about the mainland Academia Sinica?

This is a very strange article because it does not mention the Academia Sinica in Beijing, which also had origins in the Academia Sinica of the republican era. At some point, the mainland-China Academia Sinica changed the English version of its name to Chinese Academy of Sciences, but at least until the late 1980s it retained the name "Academia Sinica". I don't have any special knowledge of (or contacts with) the institution today, but I know it retained the name in the 1980s because its physics department invited me to give a couple of lectures there and I still have an old letter from my contact, dated 1987, on letterhead of the Academia Sinica: at the top 中国科学院研究生院, and in English "Graduate School, Academia Sinica", with the postal address "P.O. Box 3908, Beijing, The People's Republic of China, Telephone: 81-0831". Sayitclearly (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Academia Sinica Emblem.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Academia Sinica Emblem.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Academia Sinica Emblem.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]