Talk:Abstract Wikipedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abstract Wikipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikidata

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikidata, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's integration with Wikidata.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.WikidataWikipedia:WikiProject WikidataTemplate:WikiProject WikidataWikidata articles

motivation

Wikipedia’s efforts to get its 300 language versions on the same page | The World from PRX alludes to Croatian Wikipedia#Controversy about right-wing bias; if we can get a more explicit source, this may be good to put in a background section. Arlo James Barnes 19:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for pointer

Hi all! The article says "Nevertheless, the project has proved controversial." -- I would love to be pointed to those controversies, and make sure to see them. Could someone point me to them? --denny vrandečić (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]