Talk:Abra Durant/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Review by Epicadam (talk) 21:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   No flagrant errors, but style issues such as punctuation appearing inside quotation marks (e.g. "The sun went down," he said. not "The sun went down", he said.) could be fixed.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   I imagine that much of the plot information gathered from the TV show was "researched" by a Wikipedian for addition to this page. If there are no other plot summaries of the episodes, then I think for the purposes of this article the work can stand on its own.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Better caption for picture of character in Hawaiian-print shirt is possibly "Abra's brash style is presented visually in his wardrobe" or something to that effect.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Generally very well done. It certainly qualifies for GA status, especially when compared to the article's peers in the WikiProject Holby.