This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
I think this article should be moved from About Last Night (film) to About Last Night..., since the film's correct title is with the ellipsis. Anthony Appleyard objected to my previous move request under Uncontroversial proposals saying "But it is guaranteeable that many people looking for this page will leave the dots off. To complicate matters, page About Last Night without the dots is about a music EP record." However, I feel that this move to the film's correct title would have no influence on that. People looking for this page the way Anthony Appleyard described will end up at the article about the EP either way, whether this article is under About Last Night (film) or About Last Night.... This move will not affect that. We might additionally consider moving About Last Night to About Last Night (EP) and turning the former into a disambiguation page, but that's a different matter. --Fritz S. (Talk) 14:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't have any sense of the relative importance of the two. But assuming they're roughly equal, I think the suggestion that people will leave the ellipsis out is likely right, so About Last Night should probably be a disambiguation page. It makes sense to make the title of this article as accurate as possible, with ellipsis. But is ellipsis a distinct character from three periods? If so, people might not know which to type to link directly to the page. This is the only possible objection I can see to the move. If the characters are separate, I think somebody who is experienced with Wikipedia practice in the area of easily confused characters. If ellipsis=three periods, I support the move fully. Joeldl07:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article contains incorrect information. The two main characters names were not "Billy" and "Monique" in the movie version of this film but rather "Danny" and "Debbie". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.209.100.82 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]