Talk:Abernyte

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abernyte article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

From Abernyte Heritage Group

I received the following email:

The community of Abernyte note your apparent interest in the Wiki entry on Abernyte. Your intervention raises a number of interesting questions.

As the text to which you appear to have an interest was not taken from http://www.visitdunkeld.com/ - are you asserting some intellectual rights over this text on that site?

If so, it raises a moral question over why http://www.visitdunkeld.com/ wish to assert rights over the publicly available history and factual description of Abernyte? A small community with little or no connection with Dunkeld, who have no need to be offended by any local use of a description of the Abernyte community area by another. Indeed that sites text on Abernyte contains not a few inaccuracies and out of date observations. The remainder of the text seems to have been gleaned in the main, from the work of Melville as published in his "Fair Lands of Gowrie"

The rest of the descriptions appear to require, for good manners at least, acknowledgement of the current holder of the Barony and Lands of Kinnaird. http://www.visitdunkeld.com/ may or may not have sought that - from the site there appears no way of telling.

We thank you for your interest in Abernyte and its thriving community.

Regards

Abernyte Heritage Group

And my reply...

Hello, and thanks for the email. The article at vistitdunkeld was mearly the first site I came across with the same text - I am in no way associated with that site.

All text in Wikipedia articles must be licenced under the GFDL licence, thus it is not possible to simply paste in text from another site. Additionally it does not meet our style guidelines etc.

I have left a number of links on your Wikipedia talk page which should help to explain what Wikipedia is, and how to contribute: User talk:Infield

It would be great if you could use the text you previously pasted as a source for writing a contemporary article about the village and it's history.

Can you reply on this talk page, thanks/wangi 12:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your helpful comments to new Wiki user. We are at loss to understand how we may infringe copyright on work that is legally out of copyright or where I have the express permission of the owner. The formatting and style could have been worked on but you seem intent on simply deleting that which you wish improved.

Regards Abernyte Heritage Group

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Abernyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]