Talk:Aberdour Castle/GA1

GA Review

Minor points which need not prevent GA status:

"Easter Aberdour" links to Aberdour which is a modern day equivalent Easter and Wester Aberdour combined, so the linked page says. In ancient times I expect that Easter Aberdour was a separate village. I wonder if this is worth mentioning a bit about the town of Easter Aberdour as it was then. Snowman (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth including a photo of the dovecote? It is probably significant enough to have more about it in the article. Snowman (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to any GAN reviewers that come by: Ignore the GAN template above, this page is not currently being reviewed. Naerii 23:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I take it no-one's reviewing it then, so I will:

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 30, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Factually accurate?: Pass

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

I really find nothing to remark here, excellent article, love the plan. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Lampman ^{Talk to me!} 00:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]