Talk:Abenomics

Abenomics was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 12, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abenomics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:47, November 12, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Recent mods by contributor Kingdelrosario

In edits made 15 August, contributor Kingdelrosario has added 3 cites to an article entitled "Abenomics and the Generic Threat" authored by del Rosario, King. The URL to the article fails for me with a "server can't be found" error right now, so it is hard to tell for sure but this situation would seem to suggest that there may be a violation of Wikipedia's policy against using "Self-published sources". What do others here think? SteveT (talk) 04:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does Abenomics have a Japanese word, or is it purely an English language concept?

Does Abenomics have a Japanese word, or is it purely an English language concept? What is it called in the Japanese language?

> 安倍ノミクス　ｏｒ　アベノミクス　

which is basically, abenomikusu or abenomics haha 131.252.200.22 (talk) 22:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abenomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Abenomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abenomics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Femkemilene (talk · contribs) 09:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to review this article over the next few days. Interesting topic, but I do think there are definitely some hurdles to overcome before passing. Femke Nijsse (talk) 09:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 12, 2020, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article has quite a few problems with how it's written. For instance, quantitative easing, one of the pillars of abenomics, is never explained. Furthermore, many paragraphs are only one sentence long.

2. Verifiable?: The accuracy is severly hampered by the fact that the article is outdated. There are sentences like: there is a rising skepticism regarding Abenomics, with a reference to 2013. Unlikely that it's still rising. Another example: Although a revised figure might be significantly different to this figure, it is possible that, in the first quarter of 2016, the Japanese economy will fall into the second recession in Abe administration.: by now we do have the numbers for 2016.

3. Broad in coverage?: I think the implementation section and the lede need expansion. For the lede: a sentence or two about whether it worked or not would be useful, as would be a few sentences about the debate. For the implementation: the lede stated that Abenomics were a combination of monetary easing, fiscal stimulus and structural reforms. I think that section would benefit from having these three subsections and some examples of how the government tackled those.

4. Neutral point of view?: No obvious signs of POV

5. Stable?: Yes

6. Images?: Images are somewhat outdated. Readability would improve if they are put next to the text instead of taking up the entire rows.

The main contributor to the article, User:Annihilation00 has not shown any activity since 2017. To the nominator: I hope this feedbacks gives you some indication of how this article can be improved for GA status. I'm probably willing to go over the article again if it's renominated after some work.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Femke Nijsse (talk) 10:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]