Talk:Abella Danger

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, 17 December 2020 (UTC), see discussion.
keep, 19 April 2017, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Los Angeles

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2020)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Real name/descent

The real name mentioned in the previous version of the article and her supposed Cuban descent is not mentioned anywhere in the referenced sources, I therefore removed it.

In addition, adding a real name to the page of a sex worker, when it is not common knowledge and/or was published by themselves can actually pose a safety risk to them, any such addition should probably be carefully considered beforehand.Bip01 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is just ridiculous

She has the same amount of information as any other adult actress. There is adequate and quick information that may be garnered from the box with her information. Being in the profession she is in, there is not much personal information that should be released. There is enough information related to this person without providing a full biography or similar type information.

Scenicview1 (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Scenicview1[reply]

I agree with the sources

Appears to be all good now. Please take this notice down from the page.

Scenicview1 (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Scenicview1[reply]

issue has been resolved

It appears the issue has been resolved and adequately taken care of. I'm removing this talk page. Unless someone else has any issues. Thank you.

--Scenicview1 (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Scenicview1[reply]

Page image question

I note that an IP recently changed the image of the subject to, shall we say, one with less formal attire, which change was quickly reverted by User:Sangdeboeuf, saying "WP is not a porn site". While this is true, the article subject is a pornographic actress, so I am wondering if it doesn't make sense to have an image this is somewhat more representative of the typical appearance of the subject. BD2412 T 12:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think Danger's typical professional appearance is more or less complete nudity, which would not be appropriate here. I think we should avoid ~~titillating~~ risqué photos for the lead section in general because Wikipedia's purpose is to inform, not to arouse. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC) edited 13:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abella Danger Tux 2017

Abella Danger 2016

For context, here are the images at issue. The second (the one added by the IP), is clearly more risque; I don't know if I would call it "titillating":

The first image is the main one at the subject's Commons category page, which is the main reason I chose it. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]