Jump to content

Talk:Abdulah Muhasilović

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Abdullah Muhasilović)

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Abdullah Muhasilovic. This was actually the earliest version of this article. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah MuhasilovićAbdulah Muhasilović

Per sources and per original and commonname. The creator of the article already had reverted numerous cases of names that he intentionally writes in a non-local arabicized way. I cannot make the move as already a redirect exists. FkpCascais (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Comment" as far as his name goes, a source that demonstates what spelling is used in English would help. But I'd have thought the English form of this name would be "Abdullah Muhasilovic"; two l's in the first name, and no diacritic in the surname.
But a bigger problem is whether this bloke is even notable; I've raised the issue below. Xyl 54 (talk) 21:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Notability

[edit]

I'm having trouble seeing this persons notability.
All the article says on that score is that he was an army chaplain (like many thousands of others) and that he attended a Imam's Training Course. What else is there about him that makes him worth being the subject of an article here? Is there any reason not to put this to an AfD ? Xyl 54 (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article was created by a user who created a number of Imam´s with the criterium of having been from Bosnia. He also purpously writes the names in arabisized way, which is not the one used by sources neither the original one of the person. Anyway, I wouldn´t object to AfD this article as this subjects notability is not expressed in the article and it lacks English language sources. FkpCascais (talk) 22:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]