Talk:Ab Kettleby

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ab Kettleby article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image copyright problem with Image:Desertorchid.jpg

The image Image:Desertorchid.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Well?

I removed the citation for the Holy Well paragraph as it just pointed to somebody's profile on a forum. No mention of the well was found on the link. Additionally, although I have not researched into who "Tony" is, but I suspect he would not be deemed a reliable source. Periglio (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have any proof that it is in-fact a Holy Well/Sacred Spring? These sites were usually associated with a local saint or had some sort of saintly dedication: this has nothing. A quick google search reveals very little information about the well, and the only ones calling it a "holy well" are far from reliable sources.

The stonework surrounding the well is Grade II listed: the listing calls it a medieval well head: there is no mention of it being holy. http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-189969-well-head-ab-kettleby-leicestershire

There is a nearby village which is part of the parish of Ab Kettleby called Holwell- so maybe some confusion comes from that name?

That village too has its own spring, but that is known for its healing properties rather than for being holy: it is a Chalybeate Spring a short distance north of Holwell, known as "Holwell Mouth". http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?x=472500&y=324500&z=120&sv=holwell&st=3&tl=Map+of+Holwell+Mouth,+Leicestershire+&searchp=ids.srf

But these are defiantly not the same thing - the Well at Ab Kettleby is on Well Lane/Church Lane; Holwell Mouth is about a KM to the north, away from the villages, and hidden in some woods.

It could just be a local tradition to call it holy - anyone any ideas?

Rushton2010 (talk) 12:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to add to the confusion but the derivation of the name Holwell doesn't seem to indicate holiness either. It seems to mean spring in a hollow, which fits the description of Holwell Mouth<Dictionary of English Place-Names by AD Miles (Oxford 1992.)≥ The "holy well" tradition, if it is one, seems to go back at least to 1628. See the Inscription on Everard Digby's memorial tablet which is in Ab Kettleby Church. It puns on the name Holwell and "Holiwell", which doesn't help us decide if the holy well is at Ab Kettleby or Holwell. Spinney Hill (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

I have removed the following section:

Near the village pond, surrounded by orange-coloured ironstone cottages indicative of the area. Traditionally, it provided a good supply and never ran dry. After the construction of new houses nearby in 1992 the well dried up, but by 2001 was flowing copiously again. Unfortunately in 2001 a metal grating was fitted that blocks all access to the water. The present well structure is a truncated pyramid just over a yard high and surmounted by what at first glance appears to be an upturned font but was probably a previous basin for the well.

...Which appears to be a direct copy and paste from the following website, with no references/citations or any form of attribution http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=10223

Rushton2010 (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ab Kettleby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160220103943/https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/ to https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/%23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]