Jump to content

Talk:Aaron Rodgers/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 23:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Let me take a first look-through and see what we have going on here. Sportsguy17 (TC) 23:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a first glance at the article and unfortunately, this is looking like this is going to be a fail. The 2011-2014 seasons are poorly sourced. They have some great information in them, but unless they're sourced properly, then whether it's good info or not is immaterial. Also, several [citation needed] and other similar tags are seen throughout the article. I can tell you the steps to take in order to get this to having a chance at passing, but this time around, I do not feel comfortable passing this article. @Church: If you want me to detail out what my issues are through a more in-depth review, I can, or I can leave it to you to figure it out. It's up to you. Sportsguy17 (TC) 23:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsguy17, the nominator hasn't edited on Wikipedia since last year. At this point, over a month after your review, I think this has to be considered abandoned; since it looks to be a fail anyway, you should probably do just that. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing comment

[edit]

Nominator Church hasn't edited since December 2014, and reviewer Sportsguy17 hasn't edited since March 21, six weeks ago. Since the initial review listed a number of issues including citation needed tags and a clear lack of adequate sourcing in the 2011 through 2014 sections, and these continue to be issues, I'm closing the nomination, which does not meet the standards for being listed as a Good Article at this time. The article can be nominated again once it has been improved by addressing the issues raised here. (It can, of course, be nominated without doing so, but I'd consider that grounds for an immediate failure.) BlueMoonset (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]