Talk:Aaron Levie

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 7 April 2012 by reviewer Aaron Booth (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

University of Southern California (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Southern California, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of Southern CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California articles

Peacock terms, excessively flattering edits

This article is in appallingly bad shape. I've taken a crack at it, but it needs a lot of attention from someone who can stomach reading through all of the vapid business section newsblogs that keep being slapped on as sources. Grayfell (talk) 04:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number inflation

Many of the numbers on this page were unsupported by their sources. Saying that 97% of Fortune 500 companies use Box to blahblahblah is fine, but the source from 2011 say that it was 72%. This is extremely poor practice, and pretty sleazy, because it misrepresents the sources. Do 97% use Box? Great, if you know that, share your source, otherwise it's just promotional garbage. There is also the issue that there is no source supporting his age. Since so much has been made of him being one of the 30 under 30, and the youngest blahblahblah, I would think that somewhere someone would actually mention his birthday, or at least year. Grayfell (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unsourced birth year

Info on Levie's year of birth keeps getting fudged around. The most common year seems to be 1984, but there is no sources one way or the other. Since this seems to be a point of contention, for some reason, WP:RS and WP:BLP indicate that we should leave it out until such sources are provided. With that in mind I've removed the references to year of birth. Grayfell (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aaron Levie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130311193215/http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-29/tech/30022082_1_google-apps-enterprise-share-photos to http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-29/tech/30022082_1_google-apps-enterprise-share-photos

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]