Jump to content

Talk:A for Andromeda (2006 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Time travelling Tom Hardy fans.

[edit]

This sentence "Fleming was played by Tom Hardy, best known to science fiction fans as Shinzon in Star Trek Nemesis (2002), Eames in Christopher Nolan's sci-fi thriller Inception (2010) and Christopher Nolan's comic-book action movie The Dark Knight Rises (2012)." implies that Tom hardy was known to fans for two films that had yet to be made. I have removed the references to the two post 2006 movies. Verlaine76 (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why not do a who would go on to... bridge to these other two titles? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:C893:DDC8:A3B4:B025 (talk) 14:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A for Andromeda (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

going rat-at-a-tat carelessly on their vast computer keyboards

[edit]

Does anybody know why this is still how computers are being used on TV? Forty-odd years ago, computers were very new and hightech and we could imagine that only super-geniuses who think 20 times faster than mere mortals could operate them obviously super fast. But now a whole generation (two before too long) have grown up with the darned things and know that oftentimes the operator just has to wait for a bit for it to do its thing. Or perhaps this will remain the ideal image of a human interfacing with a computer for as long as it takes to become a reality? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:C893:DDC8:A3B4:B025 (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]