Talk:A World Lit Only by Fire (album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 09:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soon... Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm very sorry for this review being pushed back so much, but I've been really busy lately with projects, thus unable to do much on Wikipedia. I hope I can get to this in two weeks when my schedule looks better. Again, I'm very sorry but I hope you understand... Greetings; Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Cartoon network freak:. Don't worry about it! Everyone gets tied up with stuff from time to time. My power has been out for a few days, and stuff is generally crazy. So our busyness coincides nicely. Take your time. CelestialWeevil ^(talk) 22:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CelestialWeevil: Hi there again! I have read the article entirely today, and if we were to judge only by the quality of the written text, this would become GA immediately (at least). However, point 2 of the Good Article criteria is about being "verifiable". Here is a list of, at least in my opinion, unreliable references the article relies on:

Metal Insider (#4) — seems to be simply a blog, no accurate editorial oversight
Metal as Fuck (#7) — same as above; the text reads in first person, hinting at the possible fact that this is a blog
Metalorgie (#11) — see above
RIP Magazine (#44) — see above; alone from the look of thr website we can judge, I think
Ghost Cult Magazine (#58) — unsure, but ere unreliable; they say they're "professional"
Facebook (#64)

This were a few examples of information being taken from unreliable sources. As for Last Rights, the removal of these sources would mean a major trim-down of the article and a new structure would be needed. However, I don't see such a change as "minor", and this is why I have to fail this, sadly, 'cause as said it's very well-written. Hope you'll renominate in the future. Greetings and good luck; Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.