Talk:A Universe from Nothing

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy C‑class Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which god?

The first sentence says that the book discusses "modern cosmogony and its implications for the debate about the existence of God". I haven't read the book but does it simply focus on God (as in the god of Abraham and Moses), does it apply to any creator god(s)/goddess(es) or to any deity at all? Jimp 08:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Universe from Nothing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130221051332/http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/644421-afterword-from-lawrence-krauss-new-book-a-universe-from-nothing to http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/644421-afterword-from-lawrence-krauss-new-book-a-universe-from-nothing

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP: Weight

This article devotes 3 early paragraphs to blogposts from from Sean Carroll and John Horgan (misattributing Horgan's SciAm blog to Scientific American and eking out a third paragraph by quoting Horgan's main source at length.]] I think that published reviews from Nature and New Scientist deserve higher placement and more lenght than polemics by bloggers.HouseOfChange (talk) 04:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseOfChange: I also found that this article has weight issues and relies too much on unreliable sources like blogs. It's been on my TODO list a while; I'll try to improve it as time allows. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 04:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseOfChange: I have pruned a few and have added another, please review when you can. There remains some philosophical criticism that has little to do with physics, but they appear to be from notable people and in popular magazine articles. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 20:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments contradicting the book

I would like to add an external reference (link) to this page. It is a video contradicting the Krauss book. Are there any objections? Link is A Universe from Nothing - YouTube titled a Universe from nothing. It provides perspective on the definition of nothing. 22:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)22:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)22:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimjohnson2222 (talk • contribs)