Talk:A Sucessora

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Arts Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Haunted Heiress claims

I've got a copy of the book and I'm going to see if I can verify the claim in the article that this book makes claims that du Maurier's publishers gave her a copy of the book. I've already got a source for general claims of the publishers intentionally giving du Maurier a copy of the book, but I'm not sure if that specific claim for DdMHH is actually in the book. I couldn't find it via a Google book search, but maybe if I go through the book page by page I can find it. (It seems to be a good book.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reference

I removed this article from the references list, as it's about a controversy between two entirely different books. Does anyone have a better source to replace it with? SarahTheEntwife (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now I put it back; the relevant data was on the second page. Oops!

SarahTheEntwife (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]