Talk:A Silent Voice (manga)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Title
[edit]The sources given say "Crunchyroll releases Koe no Katachi" - the English name appears to be blog translation? "A Silent Voice" in Google Books hits a song by Frederic Cliffe. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Nope. Reference 1 on the page links to an ANN article that shows the English front cover of the manga which reads "A Silent Voice". Crunchyroll are distributing it digitally as A Silent Voice - Koe no Katachi. You won't find it in Google Books as it does not (yet) have an English print publisher. Shiroi Hane (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yes I saw that, this is always an issue with e-pub. Okay, I will restore to A Silent Voice (manga), thanks for the above. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Requested move 11 January 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
A Silent Voice (manga) → A Silent Voice – I think it should be moved. Kanghuitari (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – "I think it should be moved" is not an adequate rationale for a primary-topic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. If there's a primary topic here it's probably the movie. I should note that I'm not a fan of the current setup, where A Silent Voice points to the Silent Voices DAB page. It seems like a big stretch to assume someone who looks up "A Silent Voice" wants topics that are plural/are only two words... Nohomersryan (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.