Talk:A Shot in the Dark (Homicide: Life on the Street)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- This article has no Reception section, which I think is a major flaw. Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. The problem is I haven't been able to find any sources related to the Nielsen ratings or critical reviews for this particular episode. Since the article is still strong in the production aspects, I thought it could still meet GA standards as long as I wasn't actively neglecting any sources that talked about Reception. However, I will probably have access to some better news databases starting tomorrow and will take a closer look to see if I can dig anything up that I might have missed. — Hunter Kahn 19:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Humm. Really? There is nothing? That seems strange, considering the other episodes seem to be well documented. It is a huge omission, but ... if there is nothing nowhere ... Xtzou (Talk) 21:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. The problem is I haven't been able to find any sources related to the Nielsen ratings or critical reviews for this particular episode. Since the article is still strong in the production aspects, I thought it could still meet GA standards as long as I wasn't actively neglecting any sources that talked about Reception. However, I will probably have access to some better news databases starting tomorrow and will take a closer look to see if I can dig anything up that I might have missed. — Hunter Kahn 19:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I will take your word for it, since you apparently have the DVD etc. Otherwise, it is a fine article. Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance: }
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused: }
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)