Talk:A River Runs Through It (novel)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article Name? A River Runs Through It and Other Stories
[edit]Should this article be moved to A River Runs Through It and Other Stories? Thanks. Best O Fortuna (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Pronoun
[edit]What it the titular "it" that a river runs through? Asat (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A River Runs Through It (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090102092745/http://www.crankedoncinema.com:80/reviews/1995/ranger-cook-and-hole-sky to http://www.crankedoncinema.com/reviews/1995/ranger-cook-and-hole-sky
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Needs Clarification
[edit]The section on the Pulitzer prize mentions "noticing the trees." I couldn't figure out what that meant until I found a NY Times article[1] on how multiple publishers had rejected the book, one because it had "too many trees."
This information should be part of the Publishing History and the tree remark referenced to clarify the Pulitzer section remark.