Talk:A New Day in the Old Town/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 19:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I see a previous attempt at this appears to have been deleted. Let's hope I'm not doing anything wrong here then...

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Reviewed a few of these Fringe eps now, and as always, the prose style and MOS are both perfectly fine.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Citations and references are grand, everything's cited and sound.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope's fine - not too narrow or too broad.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrality is perfectly fine.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   History is hassle-free and stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Sole image is used well and fair use seems fine.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Unsurprisingly, this article will pass as a Good Article. Well done.